|
Erotic art covers any artistic work including paintings, sculptures, photographs, music and writings that is intended to evoke erotic arousal or that depicts scenes of love-making.
Definition Defining erotic art is difficult since perceptions of what is erotic fluctuate. For example, a voluptuous nude painting by Peter Paul Rubens could have been considered erotic or pornographic when it was created for a private patron in the 17th century. In a different context, a sculpture of a phallus in Africa may be considered a traditional symbol of potency though not overtly erotic. Difference with pornography A distinction is sometimes made between erotic art and pornography (which also depicts scenes of love-making and is intended to evoke erotic arousal, but is not considered art by some). However, no such objective distinction exists and the difference is often in the eye of the beholder. Historical Among the oldest surviving examples of erotic depictions are Paleolithic cave paintings and carvings, but many cultures have created erotic art. The ancient Greeks painted sexual scenes on their ceramics, many of them famous for being some of the earliest depictions of same-sex relations and pederasty. There are numerous sexually explicit paintings on the walls of ruined Roman buildings in Pompeii. The Moche of Peru are another ancient people that sculpted explicit scenes of sex into their pottery. •Additionally, there has been a long tradition of erotic painting in the east. In Japan, shunga appeared in the 13th century and continued to grow in popularity until the 19th century when photography was invented.• Similarly, the erotic art of China reached its peak during the latter part of the Ming Dynasty.• In India, the Kama Sutra is a famous sex manual still popularly read around the world. Modern
Legal standards Whether or not an instance of erotic art is obscene depends on the standards of the community in which it is displayed. In the United States, the 1973 ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. California established a three-tiered test to determine what was obscene - and thus not protected, versus what was merely erotic and thus protected by the First Amendment. Delivering the opinion of the court, Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote, "The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: (a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, (b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value." See also | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
![]() |
|
| |