|
Verilog is a hardware description language (HDL) used to model electronic systems. The language (sometimes called Verilog HDL) supports the design, verification, and implementation of analog, digital, and mixed-signal circuits at various levels of abstraction. The designers of Verilog wanted a language with syntax similar to the C programming language so that it would be familiar to engineers and readily accepted. The language has a pre-processor like C, and the major control keywords such as "if", "while", etc are similar. The formatting mechanism in the printing routines and language operators (and their precedence) are also similar. The language differs in some fundamental ways. Verilog uses Begin/End instead of curly braces to define a block of code. The definition of constants in verilog require a bit width along with their base, consequently these differ. Verilog 95 and 2001 don't have structures, pointers, or recursive subroutines either. (However, System Verilog now includes these capibilities) Finally, the concept of time —so important to a HDL— won't be found in C. The language differs from a conventional programming language in that the execution of statements is not strictly linear. A Verilog design consists of a hierarchy of modules. Modules are defined with a set of input, output, and bidirectional ports. Internally, a module contains a list of wires and registers. Concurrent and sequential statements define the behaviour of the module by defining the relationships between the ports, wires, and registers. Sequential statements are placed inside a begin/end block and executed in sequential order within the block. But all concurrent statements and all begin/end blocks in the design are executed in parallel. A module can also contain one or more instances of another module to define sub-behavior. A subset of statements in the language is synthesizable. If the modules in a design contain only synthesizable statements, software can be used to transform or synthesize the design into a netlist that describes the basic components and connections to be implemented in hardware. The netlist may then be transformed into, for example, a form describing the standard cells of an integrated circuit (e.g. an ASIC) or a bitstream for a programmable logic device (e.g. a FPGA). History Beginning Verilog was invented by Phil Moorby at Automated Integrated Design Systems (later renamed to Gateway Design Automation) in 1985 as a hardware modeling language. Gateway Design Automation was later purchased by Cadence Design Systems in 1990. Cadence now has full proprietary rights to Gateway's Verilog and the Verilog-XL simulator logic simulators. Verilog-95 With the increasing success of VHDL at the time, Cadence decided to make the language available for open standardization. Cadence transferred Verilog into the public domain under the Open Verilog International (OVI) (now known as Accellera) organization. Verilog was later submitted to IEEE and became IEEE Standard 1364-1995, commonly referred to as Verilog-95. Verilog 2001 Extensions to Verilog-95 were submitted back to IEEE to cover the deficiencies that users had found in the original Verilog standard. These extensions became IEEE Standard 1364-2001 known as Verilog 2001 Verilog 2005 Verilog 2005, IEEE Standard 1364-2005, focus mostly on minor corrections, as any language improvement was done as a separate project, known as SystemVerilog. The latest versions of the language include support for analog and mixed signal modelling. These are referred to as Verilog-AMS. SystemVerilog The advent of High Level Verification languages such as OpenVera, and Verisity's E language encouraged the development of Superlog by Co-Design Automation Inc. Co-Design Automation Inc was later purchased by Synopsys. The foundations of Superlog and Vera have been donated to Accellera. It has been transformed and updated to SystemVerilog which became the IEEE standard P1800-2005. SystemVerilog is fully alligned with Verilog-2005. Example An hello world program looks like this:
A simple example of two flip-flops follows:
The "<=" operator in verilog is another aspect of its being a hardware description language as opposed to a normal procedural language. This is known as a "non-blocking" assignment. When the simulation runs, all of the signals assigned with a "<=" operator have their assignment scheduled to occur after all statements occurring during the same point in time have executed. After all the statements have been executed for one event, the scheduled assignments are performed. This makes it easier to code behaviours that happen simultaneously. In the above example, flop1 is assigned flop2, and flop2 is assigned flop1. These statements are executed during the same time event. Since the assignments are coded with the "<=" non-blocking operator, the assignments are scheduled to occur at the end of the event. Until then, all reads to flop1 and flop2 will use the values they had at the beginning of the time event. This means that the order of the assignments are irrelevant and will produce the same result. flop1 and flop2 will swap values every clock. The other choice for assignment is an "=" operator and this is known as a blocking assignment. When the "=" operator is used, things occur in the sequence they occur much like a procedural language. In the above example, if the statements had used the "=" blocking operator instead, then the order of the statements would affect the behaviour. If the same code were used but changed to "=" operators, the reset would set flop2 to a 1, and flop1 to a 0. A clock event would set flop1 to flop2 (a 1) and this assignment would happen immediately. The next statement would assign flop2 to flop1, which is now a 1. Rather than swap values every clock, flop1 and flop2 would both become 1 and remain that way. An example counter circuit follows:
An example of delays:
The always clause above illustrates the other type of method of use, i.e. the always clause executes any time any of the entities in the list change, i.e. the b or e change. When one of these changes, immediately a and b are assigned new values. After a delay of 5 time units, c is assigned the value of b and the value of c ^ e is tucked away in an invisible store. Then after 6 more time units, d is assigned the value that was tucked away. Signals that are driven from within a process (an initial or always block) must be of type reg. Signals that are driven from outside a process must be of type wire. The keyword reg does not necessarily infer a hardware register. Definition of Constants The definition of constants in Verilog supports the addition of a width parameter. The basic syntax is: <Width in bits>'<base letter><number> Examples: Synthesizeable constructs As mentioned previously, there are several basic templates that can be used to represent hardware.
The next interesting structure is a transparent latch; it will pass the input to the output when the gate signal is set for "pass-through", and captures the input and store it upon transition of the gate signal to "hold". The output will remain stable regardless of the input signal while the gate is set to "hold". In the example below the "pass-through" level of the gate would be when the value of the if clause is true, i.e. gate = 1. This is read "if gate is true, the din is fed to latch_out continuously." Once the if clause is false, the last value at latch_out will remain and is independent of the value of din.
The flip-flop is the next significant template; in verilog, the D-flop is the simplest, and it can be modeled as:
The significant thing to notice in the example is the use of the non-blocking assignment. A basic rule of thumb is to use <= when there is a posedge or negedge statement within the always clause. A variant of the D-flop is one with an asynchronous reset; there is a convention that the reset state will be the first if clause within the statement.
The next variant is including both an asynchronous reset and asynchronous set condition; again the convention comes into play, i.e. the reset term is followed by the set term.
The final basic variant is one that implements a D-flop with a mux feeding its input. The mux has a d-input and feedback from the flop itself. This allows a gated load function.
Looking at the original counter example you can see a combination of the basic asynchronous reset flop and Gated input flop used. The register variable count is set to zero on the rising edge or rst. When rst is 0, the variable count will load new data when cet && cep is true. Initial and Always There are two separate ways of declaring a verilog process. These are the always and the initial keywords. The initial keyword indicates a process that should begin running at time 0 in the simulation. The always keyword will run its process depending on the accompanying clause (almost always..)
end always @(a or b) // Anytime a or b CHANGE, run the process if (a) c = b; else d = ~b; always @(posedge a)// Run whenever reg a has a low to high change a <= b; These are the classic uses for these two keywords, but there are two significant additional uses. The most common of these is an always keyword without the @() sensitivity list. It is possible to use always as shown below:
The always keyword acts similar to the "C" construct while(1) in the sense that it will execute forever. The other interesting exception is the use of the initial keyword with the addition of the forever keyword. The example below is functionally identical to the always example above.
Fork/Join The fork/join pair are used by Verilog to create parallel processes. All statements (or blocks) between a fork/join pair begin execution simultaneously upon execution flow hitting the fork. Execution continues after the join upon completion of the longest running statement or block between the fork and join.
end join The way the above is written, it is possible to have either the sequences "ABC" or "BAC" print out. The order of simulation between the first $write and the second $write depends on the simulator implementation. This illustrates one of the biggest issues with Verilog. You can have race conditions where the language execution order doesn't guarantee the results. Race Conditions The order of execution isn't always guaranteed within verilog. This can best be illustrated by a classic example. Consider the code snippet below:
end What will be printed out for the values of a and b? Well - it could be 0 and 0, or perhaps 0 and X! This all depends on the order of execution of the initial blocks. If the simulators scheduler works from the top of the file to the bottom, then you would get 0 and 0. If it begins from the bottom of the module and works up, then b will receive the initial value of a at the beginning of the simulation BEFORE it has been initialized to 0 (the value of any variable not set explicitily is set to X.) This is the way you can experience a race condition in a simulation. So be careful! Note that the 3rd initial block will execute as you expect because of the Operators System tasks System tasks are available to handle simple I/O, and various design measurement functions. You'll note that all the system tasks start with a $. This section presents a short list of the most often used tasks. It is by no means a comprehensive list.
Program Language Interface (PLI) Program Language Interface provides a programmer with transferring control from Verilog to a program function written in C language. It also provides task functions named tf_putlongp() and tf_getlongp which are used to write and read the argument of the current Verilog task or function, respectively. This capability enables Verilog to cooperate with other programs written in C language such as test harness, Instruction Set Simulator of microcontroller, debugger, etc. See also Free Tools Standards development | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
 |
|
| |