| [Edit]




|
In mathematics, Steinhaus–Moser notation is a means of expressing certain extremely large numbers. It is an extension of Steinhaus's polygon notation.
(a number n in a triangle)
means nn.
(a number n in a square)
is equivalent with "the number n inside n triangles, which are all nested."
(a number n in a pentagon)
is equivalent with "the number n inside n squares, which are all nested."
etc.: n written in an (m+1)-sided polygon
is equivalent with "the number n inside n m-sided polygons, which are all nested."
Steinhaus only defined the triangle, the square, and a circle , equivalent to the pentagon defined above.
Steinhaus defined:
"mega" is the number equivalent to 2 in a circle:
"megiston" is the number equivalent to 10 in a circle:
Moser's number is the number represented by "2 in a megagon", where a "megagon" is a polygon with "mega" sides.
Alternative notations:
use the functions square(x) and triangle(x)
let M(n,m,p) be the number represented by the number n in m nested p-sided polygons; then the rules are:
and
moser =
|
top
Mega


|
Note that
is already a very large number, since
=
square(square(2)) = square(triangle(triangle(2))) =
square(triangle(22)) =
square(triangle(4)) =
square(44) =
square(256) =
triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256)...))) 256 triangles =
triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(256256)...))) 255 triangles =
triangle(triangle(triangle(...triangle(3.2 × 10616)...))) 254 triangles =
...
Using the other notation:
mega = M(2,1,5) = M(256,256,3)
With the function we have mega = where the superscript denotes a functional power, not a numerical power.
We have (note the convention that powers are evaluated from right to left):
M(256,2,3) =
M(256,3,3) = ≈
Similarly:
etc.
Thus:
mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function .
Rounding more crudely (replacing the 257 at the end by 256), we get mega ≈ , using Knuth's up-arrow notation.
Note that after the first few steps the value of is each time approximately equal to . In fact, it is even approximately equal to (see also approximate arithmetic for very large numbers). Using base 10 powers we get:
( is added to the 616)
( is added to the , which is negligible; therefore just a 10 is added at the bottom)
...
mega = , where denotes a functional power of the function . Hence
|
top
Mosers number
It has been proven that Moser's number, although extremely large, is smaller than Graham's number.
Therefore, using the Conway chained arrow notation,
ightarrow 3
ightarrow 65
ightarrow 2
top
See also
|
|