|
This article deals with features of the spoken Finnish language, specifically the variant seen as dialectless. It is spoken in Greater Helsinki capital region, and in urbanized areas in the Tavastian and Central Finland dialectal areas, such as the cities of Jyväskylä, Lahti, Hyvinkää, and Hämeenlinna. The standard language takes most of its features from these dialects, i.e. most "dialectal" features are reductions with respect to this form of language. In addition, this applies also to the coastal cities, such as Vaasa and Porvoo1, which have been traditionally Swedish-speaking, and have experienced an influx of Finnish speakers from a variety of dialectal areas. The basics of Finnish needed to fully understand this article can be found in pages about Finnish phonology and Finnish grammar.
Introduction As in any language, the spoken version(s) of Finnish vary, sometimes markedly, from the written form. Some of these variations are due to speakers' inexactitude, but some aspects of spoken Finnish have different grammatical properties from written Finnish. The formal language is a constructed language, a fusion of dialects that is no one's mother tongue. Some of its constructs are either too "made up" (e.g. "soft D", cf. Finnish phonology), or too dialectal, e.g. hän (see below), for use in the spoken language. Furthermore, some very common and "accentless" sound changes are not reflected in the standard language, particularly fusion, liaison and some diphthong reductions. There is also the problem that purists want to avoid irregularity regardless of actual usage. This has left some sound changes common in spoken language out from the standard language. There is a tendency to favor "more logical" constructs over easily pronounceable ones. This ideal does reflect spoken Finnish usage to a degree, as Finnish is demostrably a conservative language with few reduction processes, but it is not entirely accurate. The problem of avoiding "irregularity" is most pronounced in spelling, where internal sandhi is not transcribed, because there is the idea that morphemes should be immutable. For example, the "correct" spelling is syönpä ("I'll eat"), even though the pronunciation is always syömpä. The explanation is that -n- and -pä are in different morphemes. Just like the explanation that English boys is not spelled with a z is that they are in different morphemes. There are also a number of grammatical forms which are used in written Finnish, but only very rarely in spoken. For example, there are a number of constructions using participles which are usually rendered analytically in speech. Some cases and moods are rarely constructive in spoken Finnish, e.g. the instructive and comitative cases and the potential mood. Some survive only in expressions. On the other hand, spoken language has its own features rare or not found in formal language. Most importantly, there is very common external sandhi, and some assimilatory sound changes. (On the contrary, there is no vowel reduction.) There are also grammatical innovations, such as question formation by simple word order, e.g. menet sä? vs. sä menet., "Do you go?" vs. "You go", respectively. In some variants (e.g. Vaasa, Kymenlaakso) of spoken Finnish -n kanssa is abbreviated into a clitic that is effectively a comitative case, e.g. -nkans or -nkaa. Pronunciation The most common reflexes for old Finnish dental fricatives are /d/ for /ð/, and /ts/ or /tt/ for /θθ/. For example, metsä or mettä < One important sound change, which has gone to completion in Estonian but occurs complicated in Finnish is mutation of word-final 'n' into a glottal stop. In some dialects, such as Savo, word-final 'n' is systematically replaced by a glottal stop, e.g. isä'iän ← isän ääni "father's voice". (Orthographically it is an apostrophe.) In the Helsinki area, both pronunciations are seen. This means that the genitive/accusative form -n, which is very common in any form of Finnish, is simply noted by a glottal stop. However, this glottal stop undergoes sandhi whenever followed by consonant, or more often than not (see below). A word-final 'i' is added to some roots, which can be reconstructed as consonant roots, without exception in standard Finnish. This 'i' is not original in many dialects, and it appears only by liaison when case endings are added. Also, in standard language, an "I-E mutation" is seen, where 'i' is used in the nominative and 'e' in some oblique forms (see Finnish phonology). This 'i' is "removed" or "added" according to the particular construction, and in spoken Finnish, a variety is seen. anteeksi — anteeks "sorry" yksi — yks "one", cf. yhden "of one" cf. tuli "fire", takki "jacket", nupi "tack", taksi "taxi", all unchanged Particularly in Helsinki, the deletion of some, but not all word-final vowels occur, especially no ambigueity results from its disappearance. This is a feature of Western Finnish dialects, found also in Savonian dialects and Estonian. mutta — mut "but" -sta — -st elative case, "away from the inside of" Word-final diphthongs ending in 'a' assimilate, especially in Helsinki, where only the resulting chroneme marks the partitive in many words. puhun suomea — puhun suomee "I speak Finnish" pitkiä — pitkii "(some) long (things)" A related phenomenon is the final consonant sandhi. It improves the rhythm of speech and allows the speech to not to "get stuck" to word boundaries, and because of this, may be heard even in formal language. When a word ends in a stressed mora, which ends in a vowel or an omittable consonant, the consonant beginning the next word is doubled and it connects the words. For example, nyt vaan becomes nyvvaan. The two words end up being pronounced with auxiliary stress is on the syllables beginning the words. This is virtually never written down, except in dialectal transcriptions. For example, "Now it arrives! You go first": Nyt se tulee! Mene sinä ensin. (standard) Ny se tulee! Mee sä ensin. (spoken, usually spelled like this) Nysse tulee! Meessä ensin. (actual pronunciation) If the consonant cannot be omitted without ambigueity, this does not happen. For example: Menetkö sinä ensin? Meeksä ensin? = "Will you go first?" The meaning would change, if the consonant was omitted: Mene sinä ensin. Meessä ensin. = "You go first." Generally, you should notice that spoken Finnish is not neatly divided up into words as the spelling would suggest, due to other phonotactical sandhi effects. For example, regardless of word boundaries, np is always mp, nk is always ŋk (where ŋ is a velar nasal). Personal pronouns Some dialects have the full-length personal pronouns 'minä' and 'sinä', but most people use shorter equivalents, like these found in Greater Helsinki region. minä → mä sinä → sä The root words are also shorter: minu- → mu-, e.g. minun → mun "my" sinu- → su-, e.g. sinun → sun "yours" The third person pronouns 'hän', 'he' are commonly used in spoken language only in Southwestern Finland, and increasingly rarely also there. Elsewhere they are usually replaced by their non-personal equivalents - note that there is no pejorative sense in talking about people as 'it', unlike in English. hän → se he → ne For example, the sentence "Did he mistake me for you?" has these forms: Luuliko hän minua sinuksi? Luuliks se mua suks? Numerals Numerals 1-10 in colloquial spoken Finnish: yks (yksi) kaks (kaksi) kolme / kol neljä / nel viis (viisi) kuus (kuusi) seittemä(n) (seitsemän) kaheksa(n) (kahdeksan) yheksä(n) (yhdeksän) kymmene(n) If one is forced to count fast then even shorter forms are used: yy kaa koo nee vii kuu sei / see kasi ysi kymppi The numerals 1–9 have their own names, different from the cardinal numbers used in counting. Numbers that have longer names are often shortened in speech. This may be problematic for a foreigner to understand, if she/he has learned words by book: ykkönen (number one) kakkonen (number two) kolmonen (number three) nelonen (number four) viitonen (number five) (→ vitonen) kuutonen (number six) (→ kutonen) seitsemäinen (number seven) → seiska kahdeksainen / kahdeksikko (number eight) → kasi / kaheksikko yhdeksäinen / yhdeksikkö (number nine) → ysi / yheksikkö The -kko suffix normally denotes a group of x people, but on 8 and 9, it doubles as a synonyme for the numeral's name. Kahdeksikko is also used to describe a lemniscate-like shape. The regular -Onen / -inen forms can additionally be used of objects with an ID number. For example, bus 107 is called sataseiska, and a competition winner is an ykkönen (not Verbs The plural first ("we") and third ("they") persons are not used as in literary language. The forms used are not considered to be proper for written language, yet they are extensively used in spoken language. As noted in the Finnish grammar page, the passive form with a pronoun me "we", instead of a separate suffix -mme, is normally used in speech for first-person plural. This happens in all forms of the verb. The third person plural suffix -vat is not used in the spoken language; instead, the third person singular form, preceded by the pronoun ne "they", is used. Therefore, the full present-tense paradigm of puhua "to speak" in everyday speech is: mä puhun (spoken) — minä puhun (standard) sä puhut — sinä puhut se puhuu — hän puhuu me puhutaan — me puhumme te puhutte — te puhutte ne puhuu — he puhuvat Some frequently used short verbs have abbreviated (irregular) oblique forms. In Finnish, verbs have an infinitive form, marked with -ta and used in the infinitive, and and oblique form, which is used in personal forms. Consonant gradation and assimilation of the 't' in -ta may be applied. In the standard language, the correspondence between the two is always regular. In spoken language, some verbs have assimilated oblique forms, while retaining the regular infinitive: For example, these forms, as such, are represented by the imperatives: Mene tai tule, mutta pane se ovi kiinni ja ole hiljaa (standard) Mee tai tuu, mut paa se ovi kii ja oo hiljaa. (word-by-word) "Go or come, but put the door closed and be quiet." To demonstrate the use of the personal form, the reply is: Meen tai tuun, paan oven kii ja oon hiljaa ("I will go or come, put the door closed and be quiet"). The infinitives are unchanged, as in: Mennä tai tulla, panna ovi kii ja olla hiljaa ("To go or to come, to put the door closed and to be quiet"). Questions In everyday speech, the -ko/kö suffix has the -s clitic added, becoming -kos/kös, which in turn reduces to -ks: olenko minä hengissä? → oonksmä hengissä? "am I alive?" puhutko sinä englantia? → puhutsä englantii? or puhuksä englantii? "do you (sg.) speak English?" tuliko hän jo? → tulikse jo? (via tuliko se jo?) "did he/she come yet?" The clitic -s is also found in imperatives, e.g. menes "(I expect you to) go!" In e.g. the Helsinki area, the -tkö elides not to -ks, but -t before a 's', e.g. menetkö sä ? menet sä. Because this is identical to sä menet except for the word order, questions are indicated by word order. Possessive suffix Spoken language has a different grammar for the possessive suffix. For direct addresses, save for one form it is not used, so that the pronoun cannot be omitted. Even in the second-person singular, the pronoun is virtually never omitted. In contrast, in the literary language, the pronoun is optional and typically omitted. Here, the pronoun of the literary form is also shown. Notice one fact: Finnish has no possessive adjectives. The pronouns are regularly inflected, like if "I's house", "you's house", "we's house". However, the suffices -s, -nsa and -nne are used to avoid repeating a pronoun, e.g. "He took his hat and left" is Se otti lakkinsa ja lähti. (The incorrect word-by-word translation from English Omission of the negative verb When a negative sentence is formed, the main verb goes into the imperative mood and gives all of its inflections to the negative verb ei, e.g. tuemme → emme tue. Usually the word mitään ("anything") and an expletive is added to the sentence. This means that even if the negative verb ei is left out, the meaning is indicated by this context. For example: Ei se mitään osaa. "He doesn't know anything." Se mitään osaa. "He know anything." Usually this construction indicates mistrust or frustration. (There is a less than serious text calling this aggressiivi.) However, it can be a neutral negative statement: Tästä artikkelista mitään opi (From this article, Important regional variations This is a feature of several dialects, such as those of Ostrobothnia and Savonia: breaking up some consonant clusters on syllable boundaries with an epenthetic vowel. The neutral vowel is the same as the preceding vowel. For example, juhla → juhula "celebration", salmi → salami "strait", palvelu → palavelu "service", halpa → halapa, äffä → ähävä (via ähvä) "letter F". Pairs of dissimilar consonants with /l/ or /h/ (in Savo, also /n/) as the first consonant are subject to epenthesis; other clusters or geminates are not. However, a strong epenthetic vowel is seen as dialectal, and in Helsinki and urbanized areas, indicates origins "in the countryside" (since for Helsinki people, everything but Helsinki is rural). One small detail, which irritates people from other places to no end, is that the word kuka ("who") is replaced by its partitive form, ketä ("at who"), e.g. Ketä siellä oli? ("Who was there?") Other unusual question pronouns are mihinä (std. missä, "where") and mihkä (std. mihin, "into where"). Here, the word mihinä uses the ancient Finnish locative currently known as the essive case, instead of the standard specialized locative inessive case. See also | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
| |