[Edit]

top

top

For a network of N nodes, only N-1 routes are necessary to connect all nodes; that is, the complexity is O(N). This compares favorably to the N
(N-1) nodes, or O(N²), that would be required to connect each node to every other node in a point-to-point network.

The reduced number of routes generally leads to more efficient use of scarce transportation resources. For example, aircraft will be more likely to fly at full capacity, and can often fly routes multiple times in a single day.

Complicated operations such as package sorting can be consolidated at the hub, rather than maintained separately at each node.

Spokes are simpler, and new spokes can be connected rapidly.

Customers may find the network to be simpler and more intuitive. Scheduling is more convenient for customers since there are fewer routes with more frequent service.

top

The model is centralized and day-to-day operations may be relatively inflexible. Changes at the hub or even in a single route could have unexpected consequences across the network. It may be difficult or impossible to handle occasional periods of high demand between 2 spokes.

Route scheduling is more complicated for the network operator. Scarce resources must be utilized carefully to avoid starving the hub. Careful traffic analysis and precise timing is required to keep the hub operating efficiently.

The hub constitutes a bottleneck in the network. Total cargo capacity of the network is limited by the hub's capacity. Delays at the hub (e.g., weather) can result in delays across the entire network. Delays at a spoke (e.g., mechanical problems with an aircraft) can also affect the network, although to a lesser extent.

Cargo must be routed through the hub before reaching its destination, possibly requiring a much longer journey than a direct point-to-point connection. This is often a desirable tradeoff for freight, which can take advantage of the sorting capabilities of the hub, but it may be unacceptable for time-critical cargo such as passengers.

top

top