|
Speed reading is a controversial reading technique. Proponents of speed reading claim that it is the assimilation of several words or phrases at a glance, which is accomplished by various methods. Detractors claim that the technique is merely skimming or that the entire concept is a marketing scam.
History Psychologists and educational specialists working on the visual acuity question devised the tachistoscope, which is a machine designed to flash images at varying rates on a screen. The experiment started with large pictures of aircraft being displayed for participants. The images were gradually reduced in size and the flashing-rate was increased. They found that, with training, an average person could identify minute images of different planes when flashed on the screen for only one-five-hundredth of a second. The results had implications for reading. Using the same methodology, the U.S. Air Force soon discovered that they could flash four words simultaneously on the screen at rates of one five-hundredth of a second with full recognition by the reader. This training demonstrated clearly that, with some work, reading speeds could be increased from reading rates to skimming rates. Not only could they be increased but the improvements were made by improving visual processing. Therefore, the next step was to train eye movements by means of a variety of pacing techniques in an attempt to improve reading. The reading courses that followed used the tachistoscope to increase reading speeds; it assumed that readers were able to increase their effective speeds from 200 to 400 words per minute using the machine. The drawback to the tachistoscope was that post-course timings showed that, without the machine, speed increases rapidly diminished. Following the tachistoscope discoveries, the Harvard Business School produced the first film-aided course, designed to widen the reader’s field of focus in order to increase reading speed. Again, the focus was on visual processing as a means of improvement. Using machines to increase people's reading speeds was a trend of the 1940s. While it had been assumed that reading speed increases of 100% were possible and had been attained, lasting results had yet to be demonstrated. It was not until the late 1950s that a portable, reliable and 'handy' device would be developed as a tool for promoting reading speed increases. The researcher was a school-teacher named Evelyn Wood. She was committed to understanding why some people were naturally faster at reading than others and was trying to force herself to read very quickly. It is told that while brushing off the pages of the book she had thrown down in despair, she discovered that the sweeping motion of her hand across the page caught the attention of her eyes, and helped them move more smoothly across the page. She then utilized the hand as a pacer, and called it the "Wood Method." which was renamed into Reading Dynamics in 1958. More recently, speed reading courses and books have been developed promising the consumer even higher increases in reading speed, some at 10,000 words per minute with high comprehension. With specific reference to pseudoscience concepts, they have even claimed to be able to extract meaning out of consciously unnoticed text from the para-consciousness or subconscious. These courses go by various titles such as photo-reading (1994), mega-speedreading (1997) and alpha-netics (1999). They tend to be accompanied with the sale of expensive electronic machinery. Reading experts refer to them as snake oil reading lessons because of their high dependence on the suspension of the consumer’s disbelief. Other researchers have gone in the opposite direction. Rather than seeking increased reading speed, they have focused on comprehension. These approaches include Rapid Analytical Reading (2005), and have been marketed primarily to college students and corporations. Advertisement and claims Businesses selling courses and manuals on speed reading claim that it is possible to increase the rate of reading to beyond 1000 words per minute with full comprehension, provided the course is followed and that the exercises are constantly practiced. However, a good deal of these courses and manuals are conflicting as to why and how speed reading should be adopted as a method. Some courses claim that reading at over 1000 wpm is advantageous for all types of reading material, whereas others say that it is best only for novels. Some say that speed reading is not appropriate for reading poetry and others say that it is . Some sources go even further, claiming that speed reading will increase IQ, memory, and comprehension ability. Other sources claim that it will only improve rate and comprehension. One point of contention between the various speed reading courses is the assertions concerning subvocalization. Some courses claim that the main obstacle to speed reading is any form of subvocalization. Other courses claim that subvocalization can be used on keywords in order to speed up learning and reading. And some proponents of speed reading claim that subvocalization can be broken down into two levels, only one of which will reduce reading speed. Speed reading courses and books take a variety of approaches to the concept of reading comprehension. Some courses and books claim that good comprehension is essential to speed reading, and that comprehension will improve with speed reading. Special non-standardized reading comprehension questionnaires are provided in order to convince the reader of the effects of the program. Some courses advise that while comprehension is important, it should not be measured or promoted above the speed of reading. Other courses and books argue that 90% of reading material is irrelevant and so comprehension should simply be ignored. Speed reading courses variously claim that not all information in text needs to be covered whilst speed reading. Some claim that speed reading involves skipping text (exactly as has been measured during studies on skimming), whereas other speed reading promoters claim that all of the text is processed, but with some or most becoming subconciously processed. Similarly, some courses claim that text should be serially processed whereas others say that information is processed in a more haphazard or ad hoc fashion. Terminology such as vision span and subvocalization are often used as explanations, but findings of research into these terms is not presented. Concepts There are reputable courses that are based on normal academic reading theories, such as Some of the explanations used to promote less reputable courses include theories from popular psychology, urban myths about the brain and pseudoscience. These concepts include Prescriptions and training Speed reading courses and books prescribe a variety of techniques that they claim will increase reading rate whilst retaining good comprehension. Speed reading learners are instructed to Some speed reading courses and books also include study and memorization techniques such as Learning 3Rs Read, Record and Recite (Abela 2004)(Whitaker 2005). Claims of real life speed readers According to some speed reading advocates, the World Championship Speed Reading Competition stresses reading comprehension as critical, and that the top contestants typically read around 1000 to 2000 words per minute with approximately 50% comprehension. The 10,000 WPM claimants have yet to reach this level. Much controversy is raised over this point. This is mainly because a reading comprehension level of 50% is deemed a failure by normal reading teachers, the public at large, and reading experts (Carver 1992). Speed reading advocates claim that it is a great success and even state that it is a demonstration of good comprehension (Buzan 2000). There are savants such as Kim Peek who are known to read at truly stunning speeds with some comprehension and complete memory. Peek is known to have memorized approximately 9,600 books. Nobody knows exactly how he does it, except that his corpus callosum has been missing since birth. However, his comprehension level does not match his ability to input and recall texts. John Stuart Mill once claimed that he could read faster than he could turn pages. He may have been referring to simple skimming or scanning, although he is often used by speed reading proponents as an example of a natural speed reader, and to imply that they can teach a pupil to have the same abilities as J.S. Mill. U.S. President John F. Kennedy was a proponent of speed reading * and encouraged his staff to take lessons. President Jimmy Carter and his wife Rosalynn, both avid readers, enrolled in a speed-reading course (which their daughter Amy Carter attended briefly) at the White House *, along with several staff members. Scholarly research Some reading research has indicated that instructing a group or class of readers to speed up their reading rate will increase reading comprehension to a limited degree. In fact, inexperienced readers will often choose a rate slower than is appropriate for the material being read. However, this is only true to up to a point. When reading rate is increased to beyond the reading for comprehension rate (over approximately 400wpm), comprehension will drop to an unacceptable level (below 50% comprehension) as measured on standardized reading tests (Cunningham et al 1990). Empirical research on reading rate indicates that reading for comprehension is best achieved at 200-350 words per minute. This has been found to be constant for all competent readers (Homa 1983). Research conducted on rapid reading courses indicates that they are actually teaching a limited kind of skimming (Carver 1992). Skimming can be learned easily without the need for an expensive course, and involves reading at a rapid rate for the purpose of searching rather than comprehension (Carver 1992). As a habitual reading rate, it is inappropriate for sufficiently comprehending newspaper articles, textbooks, and novels (Allyn & Bacon, 1987). Research on subvocalization, or auding, shows that it is a natural process which helps comprehension, and can be encouraged, especially for the purpose of reading high quality prose (Carver, 1990). Subvocalizing will only decrease reading rate if it is accompanied by obviously visible movements of the mouth, jaw or throat. Research conducted on speed reading experts who claim to be able to read at over 1,000 words per minute with full comprehension has found that their claims are false (Homa 1983). Even speed reading rates of between 1000-2000 wpm have been found to result in comprehension levels at around 50% or lower. Also, when presented with two paragraphs of combined but unrelated material, speed reading experts claimed that they understood it but were completely unaware that it consisted of two obviously different passages mixed together (Allyn & Bacon, 1987). One interesting outcome from research into speed reading is that speed readers tend to poorly assess their own comprehension level when compared to normal readers who are simply instructed to skim a text (Allyn & Bacon, 1987). The skimming group was found to be better at extracting the details out of a text than speed readers. This may be explained with reference to speed reading practices training out the ability to judge comprehension (Allyn & Bacon, 1987) and leading the reader to adopt misconceptions about reading (Harris and Sipay 1990). Professional reading rate researchers' general advice about speed reading courses is simply not to enroll (Carver 1992) (Perfetti 1995). Skimming can be learned easily without the need for expensive courses, and comprehensive study techniques can be learned for free or for a small fee at community colleges (Carver 1992). Indeed, great results can be obtained using reading rates appropriate to the material, a wide repertoire of learning strategies, and an accurate judgment of reading comprehension (Harris and Sipay 1990). Software Speed reading computer application programs are available. Vortex Speed Reading was the original; however Vallier, the creator of the program, did not update it and it would not work in Windows XP. Since Vortex Speed Reading dropped out of line, replacement programs are available on the Internet. Speed reading programs use a different approach to the usual 'speed reading' tips where a few words are grouped together to be read. The software presents words to the reader one at a time in the same position, stopping the eyes from having to move around as they would on a normal paragraph. The programs present the data as a serial stream as the only way the brain handles text is breaking it up into a serial stream before parsing and interpreting it. Speed reading programs pre-processes and serializes text, so the brain does not need to do so. Usually, commas and semi-colons have a single break and periods, question marks, exclamation marks, and speech marks have a double break. One speedreading program by the name of EyeQ also includes watching the center of the screen while watching the lines around it expand, watching a bunch of objects move by in a line instead of texts and watching an object bounce around up and down, left and right and require the user to focus their eyes on the object while it moves. The method of using objects are criticized by some stating that the only way to read faster is to read actual texts. These people may range from people being satisfied with their ability to skim fast to people who have tried speedreading programs that emphasize solely on texts. It is important to note that since speed reading is at best a pseudoscience at this point that the pro or anti opinions of these people must be handled with skepticism until further credible tests have been done. It is also crucial for any user hoping to buy these programs to be extremely skeptical even at the face of positive reviews. Some signs to look for are claims of completely eliminating subvocalization and high word per minute results ranging into the 3000 wpm above from just using the software. Speedreading results have varied from people to people and speedreading softwares are no exception. See also | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
| |