|
Shor's algorithm is a quantum algorithm for factoring a number N in O((log N)3) time and O(log N) space, named after Peter Shor. The algorithm is significant because it implies that RSA, a popular public-key cryptography method, might be easily broken, given a sufficiently large quantum computer. RSA uses a public key N which is the product of two large prime numbers. One way to crack RSA encryption is by factoring N, but with classical algorithms, factoring becomes increasingly time-consuming as N grows large; more specifically, no classical algorithm is known that can factor in time O((log N)k) for any k. By contrast, Shor's algorithm can crack RSA in polynomial time. Like many quantum computer algorithms, Shor's algorithm is probabilistic: it gives the correct answer with high probability, and the probability of failure can be decreased by repeating the algorithm. However, since a proposed answer (in particular primality) is polynomial time verifiable, the algorithm can be modified to work in expected polynomial time with zero error. Shor's algorithm was discovered in 1994 by Peter Shor, but the classical part was known before, it is credited to G. L. Miller. Seven years later, in 2001, it was demonstrated by a group at IBM, which factored 15 into 3 and 5, using a quantum computer with 7 qubits. Procedure The problem we are trying to solve is that, given an integer N, we try to find another integer p between 1 and N that divides N. Shor's algorithm consists of two parts: Classical part
Quantum part: Period-finding subroutine
Explanation of the algorithm The algorithm is composed of two parts. The first part of the algorithm turns the factoring problem into the problem of finding the period of a function, and may be implemented classically. The second part finds the period using the inverse quantum Fourier transform, and is responsible for the quantum speedup. I. Obtaining factors from period The integers less than N and coprime with N form a finite group under multiplication modulo N, which is typically denoted (Z/NZ)×. By the end of step 3, we have an integer a in this group. Since the group is finite, a must have a finite order r, the smallest positive integer such that Therefore, N | (a r − 1). Suppose we are able to obtain r, and it is even. Then r is the smallest positive integer such that a r ≡ 1, so N cannot divide (a r / 2 − 1). If N also does not divide (a r / 2 + 1), then N must have a nontrivial common factor with each of (a r / 2 − 1) and (a r / 2 + 1). Proof: For simplicity, denote (a r / 2 − 1) and (a r / 2 + 1) by u and v respectively. N | uv, so kN = uv for some integer k. Suppose gcd(u, N) = 1; then mu + nN = 1 for some integers m and n (this is a property of the greatest common divisor.) Multiplying both sides by v, we find that mkN + nvN = v, so N | v. By contradiction, gcd(u, N) ≠ 1. By a similar argument, gcd(v, N) ≠ 1. This supplies us with a factorization of N. If N is the product of two primes, this is the only possible factorization. II. Finding the period Shor's period-finding algorithm relies heavily on the ability of a quantum computer to be in many states simultaneously. Physicists call this behaviour a "superposition" of states. To compute the period of a function f, we evaluate the function at all points simultaneously. Quantum physics does not allow us to access all this information directly, though. A measurement will yield only one of all possible values, destroying all others. Therefore we have to carefully transform the superposition to another state that will return the correct answer with high probability. This is achieved by the inverse quantum Fourier transform. Shor thus had to solve three "implementation" problems. All of them had to be implemented "fast", which means that they can be implemented with a number of quantum gates that is polynomial in .
After all these transformations a measurement will yield an approximation to the period r. For simplicity assume that there is a y such that yr/N is an integer. Then the probability to measure y is 1. To see that we notice that then for all integers b. Therefore the sum whose square gives us the probability to measure y will be N/r since b takes roughly N/r values and thus the probability is . There are r y such that yr/N is an integer and also r possibilities for , so the probabilities sum to 1. Note: another way to explain Shor's algorithm is by noting that it is just the quantum phase estimation algorithm in disguise. Modifications to Shors Algorithm There have been many modifications to Shor's algorithm. For example, whereas, an order of twenty to thirty runs are required on a quantum computer in the case of Shor's original algorithm, and with some of the other modifications, in the case of the modification done by David McAnally at the University of Queensland an order of only four to eight runs on the quantum computer is required. | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
![]() |
|
| |