Navigation
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Most Active
  • Popular
  • Blog
  • Credits
  • RSS
  •   Interaction
  • Register
  • Statistics
  •   Help
  • Suggestions
  • Contact Us
  • How to Edit
  • Help



  • [Edit]


    In celestial mechanics, an orbital resonance occurs when two orbiting bodies exert a regular, periodic gravitational influence on each other, usually due to their orbital periods being related by a ratio of two small integers. Orbital resonances greatly enhance the mutual gravitational influence of the bodies. In most cases, this results in an unstable interaction, in which the bodies exchange momentum and shift orbits until the resonance no longer exists. Under some circumstances, a resonant system can be stable and self correcting, so that the bodies remain in resonance. Examples are the 4:2:1 resonance of Jupiter's moons Ganymede, Io, and Europa, and the 3:2 resonance between Neptune and Pluto. Unstable resonances with Saturn's inner moons give rise to gaps in the rings of Saturn. The special case of 1:1 resonance (between bodies with similar orbital radii) causes large solar system bodies to "clear out" the region around their orbits by ejecting nearly everything else around them; this effect is used in the current definition of a planet.


        Orbital resonance
            History
            Types of resonance
            Mean motion resonances in the Solar System
                The Laplace resonance
                Pluto resonances
            Near mean motion resonances
            See also

    top

    History
    Ever since the discovery of Newton's law of universal gravitation in the 17th century, the stability of planetary orbits has preoccupied many mathematicians, starting with Laplace. The stable orbits that arise in a two-body approximation ignore the influence of other bodies. These added interactions, even when very small, might add up over longer periods to significantly change the orbital parameters and leading to a completely different configuration of the Solar System. Or, it was thought, some other stabilising mechanisms might be there. It was Laplace who found the first answers explaining the remarkable dance of the Galilean moons (see below).
    It is fair to say that this general field of study has remained very active since then, with plenty more yet to be understood (e.g. how interactions of moonlets with particles of the rings of giant planets result in maintaining the rings).

    top

    Types of resonance

    In general, an orbital resonance may
      involve one or any combination of the orbit parameters (e.g. eccentricity versus semimajor axis, or eccentricity versus orbit inclination).
      act on any time scale from short term, commensurable with the orbit periods to secular (measured in 104 to 106 years).
      lead to either long term stabilisation of the orbits or be the cause of their destabilization.

    A mean motion orbital resonance occurs when two bodies have periods of revolution that are a simple integer ratio of each other. Depending on the details, this can either stabilize or destabilize the orbit.
    Stabilization occurs when the two bodies move in such a synchronised fashion that they never closely approach. For instance:
      Pluto and the Plutinos are in stable orbits, despite crossing the orbit of the much larger Neptune. This is because a 3:2 resonance keeps them always at a large distance from it. Other (much more numerous) Neptune-crossing bodies that were not in resonance were ejected from that region by strong perturbations due to Neptune.
      The Trojan asteroids may be regarded as being protected by a 1:1 resonance with Jupiter.
    Orbital resonances can also destabilize one of the orbits. For small bodies, destabilization is actually far more likely. For instance:
      There is a series of almost empty lanes in the asteroid belt called Kirkwood gaps corresponding to mean-motion resonances with Jupiter. Almost all asteroids in those regions have been ejected by the repeated perturbations.

    A Laplace resonance occurs when three or more orbiting bodies have a simple integer ratio between their orbital periods. For example, Jupiter's moons Ganymede, Europa, and Io are in a 1:2:4 orbital resonance.

    A Secular resonance occurs when the precession of two orbits is synchronised (usually a precession of the perihelion or ascending node). A small body in secular resonance with a much larger one (e.g. a planet) will precess at the same rate as the large body. Over long times (a million years, or so) a secular resonance will change the eccentricity and inclination of the small body. A prominent example is the ν6 secular resonance between asteroids and Saturn. Asteroids which approach it have their eccentricity slowly increased until they become mars-crossers, at which point they are usually ejected from the asteroid belt due to a close pass to Mars. This resonance forms the inner and "side" boundaries of the main asteroid belt around 2 AU, and at inclinations of about 20°.

    A Kozai resonance occurs when the inclination and eccentricity of a perturbed orbit oscillate synchronously (increasing eccentricity while decreasing inclination and vice versa). This resonance applies only to bodies on highly inclined orbits. One of the consequences of this resonance is the lack of bodies on highly inclined orbits, as the growing eccentricity would result in small pericenters, typically leading to a collision or destruction by tidal forces for large moons.

    top

    Mean motion resonances in the Solar System

    There are only a few known mean motion resonances in the Solar system involving planets or larger satellites (a much greater number involve asteroids, rings and moonlets).

    The simple integer ratios between periods are a convenient simplification hiding more complex
    relations:
      the point of conjunction can oscillate (librate) around an equilibrium point defined by the resonance.

    As illustration of the latter, consider the well known 1:2 resonance of Io-Europa. If the orbiting periods were in this relation, the mean motions n,! (inverse of periods, often expressed in degrees per day) would satisfy the following

    n_ - 2cdot n_ = 0


    Substituting the data (from Wikipedia) one will get −0.7395° day−1, a value substantially different from zero!

    Actually, the resonance is perfect but it involves also the precession of perijove (the point closest to Jupiter) dotomega
    The correct equation (part of the Laplace equations) is:

    n_ - 2cdot n_ + dotomega_ = 0


    In other words, the mean motion of Io is indeed double of that of Europa taking into account the precession of the perijove. An observer sitting on the (drifting) perijove will see the moons coming into conjunction in the same place (elongation).
    The other pairs listed above satisfy the same type of equation with the exception of Mimas-Tethys resonance. In this case, the resonance satisfies the equation

    4cdot n_ - 2cdot n_ - Omega_- Omega_= 0


    The point of conjunctions librates around the midpoint between the nodes of the two moons.

    top

    The Laplace resonance

    The most remarkable resonance involving Io-Europa-Ganymede includes the following relation locking the orbital phase of the moons:

    Phi_L = lambda_ - 3cdotlambda_ + 2cdotlambda_ = 180^circ


    where lambda are mean longitudes of the moons.
    This relation makes a triple conjunction impossible. The graph illustrates the positions of the moons after 1, 2 and 3 Io periods.

    top

    Pluto resonances
    Pluto is following an orbit trapped in a web of resonances with Neptune. The resonances include
      Mean motion resonance 2:3 (2 orbits of Pluto for 3 orbits of Neptune)
      The resonance of the perihelion (libration around 90°), keeping the perihelion above the ecliptic
      The resonance of the longitude of the perihelion in relation to that of Neptune, keeping the separation between the two bodies at the closest encounter. (see Pluto's orbit for detailed explanation and graphs).

    top

    Near mean motion resonances

    Other near resonances exist among the moons including:

    Saturn system
    Uranus system
    The absence of (precise) resonances in the Uranus system, given their abundance in the Saturn and Jupiter systems is actually a bit of an enigma.

    top

    See also
      Mercury, which has a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance.
     
    Search more:
     

       
    Source Privacy License Download Contact Us Atlas
    Scientus.org Dictionary (Yet Another Wiki) RC : 1.39
    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License [copyleft]. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Orbital resonance". link