Navigation
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Most Active
  • Popular
  • Blog
  • Credits
  • RSS
  •   Interaction
  • Register
  • Statistics
  •   Help
  • Suggestions
  • Contact Us
  • How to Edit
  • Help



  • [Edit]



    The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) is the minimal extension to the Standard Model that realizes supersymmetry (non-minimal extensions exist). Supersymmetry pairs bosons with fermions, therefore every Standard Model particle has a partner that has yet to be discovered. If these supersymmetric partners exist, it is likely that they will be observed at the Large Hadron Collider, which is planned to begin running in 2007. If the superparticles are found, it is analogous to discovering antimatter and depending on the details of what is found, it could provide evidence for grand unification and might even in principle provide hints as to how string theory describes nature.

    The MSSM was originally proposed 1981 to stabilize the weak scale, solving the hierarchy problem. The Higgs mass of the Standard Model is unstable to quantum corrections and the theory predicts that weak scale should be much weaker than what is observed to be. In the MSSM, the Higgs has a fermionic superpartner, called the Higgsino, that would have the same mass as itself if supersymmetry was an exact symmetry. Because fermion masses are radiatively stable, the Higgs mass inherits this stability.

    The only unambiguous way to claim discovery of supersymmetry is to produce superparticles in the laboratory. Because superparticles are expected to be 100 to 1000 times heavier than the proton, it requires a huge amount of energy to make these particles that can only be achieved at particle accelerators. Currently the Tevatron is the highest energy particle collider and is actively looking for evidence of the production of supersymmetric particles. Most physicists believe that supersymmetry must be discovered at the LHC if it is responsible for stabilizing the weak scale. There are five classes of particle that superpartners of the Standard Model fall into: squarks, gluinos, charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons. These superparticles have their interactions and subsequent decays described by the MSSM and each has characteristic signatures.



    The MSSM imposes R-parity to explain the stability of the proton. It adds supersymmetry breaking by introducing explicit soft supersymmetry breaking operators into the Lagrangian that is communciated to it by some unknown (and unspecified) dynamics. This means that there are 120 new parameters in the MSSM. Most of these parameters lead to unnacceptable phenomenology such as large flavor changing neutral currents or large electric dipole moments for the neutron and electron. To avoid these problems, the MSSM takes all of the soft susy breaking to be diagonal in flavor space and for all of the new CP violating phases to vanish.


        Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
            Theoretical Motivations
                Naturalness
                Gauge Coupling Unification
                Dark Matter
            Discovery of the MSSM at Hadron Colliders
                Neutralinos
                Charginos
                Squarks
                Gluinos
                Sleptons
            MSSM Fields
                MSSM Superfields
            The MSSM Lagrangian
                Soft Susy Breaking
                    The CMSSM
            Electroweak Symmetry Breaking
                The Higgs Mass
                Neutralinos and Charginos
            Problems with the MSSM
            Theories of Supersymmetry Breaking

    top

    Theoretical Motivations
    There are three principle motivations for the MSSM over other theoretical extensions of the Standard Model, namely:
      Naturalness
      Gauge coupling unification
      Dark Matter
    These motivations come out without much effort and they are the primary reasons why the MSSM is the leading candidate for a new theory to be discovered at collider experiments such as the Tevatron or the LHC.

    top

    Naturalness






    The original motivation for proposing the MSSM was to stabilize the Higgs mass to radiative corrections that are
    quadratically divergent in the Standard Model (hierarchy problem). In supersymmetric models, scalars are related to fermions and
    have the same mass. Since fermion masses are logarithmically divergent, scalar masses inherit the same
    radiative stability. The Higgs vacuum expectation value is related to the negative scalar mass in the Lagrangian.
    In order for the radiative corrections to the Higgs mass to not be dramatically larger than the actual value, the
    mass of the superpartners of the Standard Model should not be significantly heavier than the Higgs vev --
    roughly 100 GeV. This mass scale is being probed currently at the Tevatron and will be more extensively
    explored at the LHC.


    top

    Gauge Coupling Unification
    If the superpartners of the Standard Model are near the TeV scale, then measured gauge couplings of the three
    gauge groups unify at High energies. The beta functions for the MSSM gauge couplings are given by






    Gauge Groupalpha^(M_)b_0^
    SU(3)8.5-3
    SU(2)29.6+1
    U(1)59.2+6 rac

    where alpha^_ is measured in SU(5) normalization -- a factor of rac different
    than the Standard Model's nomalization and predicted by Georgi-Glashow SU(5) .

    The condition for gauge coupling unification at one loop is whether the following expression is satisfied
    rac = rac.

    Remarkably, this is precisely satisfied to experimental errors. There are two loop corrections and both TeV-scale and GUT-scale threshold corrections that alter this condition on gauge coupling unification, and the results of more extensive calculations reveal that gauge coupling unification occurs to an accuracy of 1%, though this is about 3 standard deviations from the theoretical expectations.

    This prediction is generally considered as indirect evidence for both the MSSM and SUSY GUTs. It should be noted that gauge coupling unification does not necessarily imply grand unification and there exist other mechanisms to reproduce gauge coupling unification. However, if superpartners are found in the near future, the apparent success of gauge coupling unification would suggest that a supersymmetric grand unified theory is a promising candidate for high scale physics.

    top

    Dark Matter
    If R-parity is preserved, then the lightest superparticle (LSP) of the MSSM is stable and is a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) — i.e. it does not have electromagnetic or strong interactions. This makes the LSP a good dark matter candidate and falls into the category of cold dark matter (CDM) particle.

    top

    Discovery of the MSSM at Hadron Colliders
    The Tevatron and LHC have active experimental programs searching for supersymmetric particles. Since both of these machines are hadron colliders — proton antiproton for the Tevatron and proton proton for the LHC — they search best for strongly interacting particles. Therefore most experimental signature involve production of squarks or gluinos. Since the MSSM has R-parity, the lightest supersymmetric particle is stable and after the squarks and gluinos decay each decay chain will contain one LSP that will leave the detector unseen. This leads to the generic prediction that the MSSM will produce a 'missing energy' signal from these particles leaving the detector.

    top

    Neutralinos
    There are four Neutralinos that are fermions and are electrically neutral, the lightest of which is typically stable.
    They are typically labeled ilde_1^0, ldots, ilde_4^0. These four states are mixtures of
    the Bino, neutral Wino, and neutral Higgsinos. Because these particles only interact with the weak vector bosons,
    they are not directly produced at hadron colliders in copious numbers. They primarily appear as particles in cascade
    decays of heavier particles usually originating from colored supersymmetric particles such as squarks or gluinos.

    In R-parity conserving models, the lightest neutralino is stable and all supersymmetric cascades decays end up decaying
    into this particle which leaves the detector unseen and its existence can only be inferred by looking for unbalanced momentum
    in a detector.

    The heavier neutralinos typically decay through a Z^0 to a lighter neutralino or through a W^pm to chargino. Thus a typical decay is
      ilde^0_2
    ightarrow ilde_1^pm W^mp
    ightarrow ilde_1^0 W^pm W^mp
    ightarrow Missing energy + ell^+ell^-
      ilde^0_2
    ightarrow ilde^0_1 Z^0
    ightarrowMissing energy + ell^+ ell^-

    The mass splittings betweent the different Neutralinos will dictate which patterns of decays are allowed.

    top

    Charginos
    There are two Charginos that are fermions and are electrically charged. The heavier chargino can decay through Z^0 to the lighter chargino. Both can decay through a W^pm to neutralino.

    top

    Squarks
    The squarks are the scalar superpartners of the quarks and there is one version for each Standard Model quark.
    Due to phenomenological constraints from flavor changing neutral currents, typically the lighter two generations
    of squarks have to be nearly the same in mass and therefore are not given distinct names. The superpartners of
    the top and bottom quark can be split from the lighter squarks and are called stops and sbottoms.

    Squarks can be produced through strong interactions and therefore are easily produced at hadron colliders.
    They decay to quarks and neutralinos or charginos which further decay. Squarks are typically pair produced
    and therefore a typical signal is
      ilde ilde
    ightarrow q ilde^0_1 ar ilde^0_1
    ightarrow 2 jets + Missing energy
      ilde ilde
    ightarrow q ilde^0_2 ar ilde^0_1
    ightarrow q ilde^0_1 ell ar ar ilde^0_1
    ightarrow 2 jets + 2 leptons + Missing energy

    top

    Gluinos
    Gluinos are Majorana fermionic partners of the gluon which means that they are their own antiparticles.
    They interact strongly and therefore can be produced significantly at the LHC. They can only decay to a quark
    and a squark and thus a typical gluino signal is
      ilde ilde
    ightarrow (q ilde) (ar ilde)
    ightarrow (q ar ilde^0_1) (ar q ilde^0_1)
    ightarrow 4 jets + Missing energy

    Because gluinos are Majorana, gluinos can decay to either a quark+anti-squark or an anti-quark+squark with equal probability. Therefore pairs of gluinos can decay to
      ilde ilde
    ightarrow (ar ilde) (ar ilde)
    ightarrow (q ar ilde^+_1) (q ar ilde^+_1)
    ightarrow (q ar W^+) (q ar W^+)
    ightarrow 4 jets+ ell^+ ell^++ Missing energy

    This is a distinctive signature because it has same-sign di-leptons and has very little background in the Standard Model.

    top

    Sleptons
    Sleptons are the scalar partners of the leptons of the Standard Model. They are not strongly interacting and therefore are not produced very often at hadron colliders unless they are very light. They will typically be found in decays of a charginos and neutralinos if they are light enough to be a decay product

      ilde^+
    ightarrow ilde^+
    u
      ilde^0
    ightarrow ilde^+ ell^-

    top

    MSSM Fields
    Fermions have bosonic superpartners, and bosons have fermionic superpartners. For most of the Standard Model
    particles, doubling is very straight forward. However, for the Higgs boson, it is more complicated.

    A single Higgsinos (the fermionic superpartner of the Higgs boson) would lead to a gauge anomaly and would cause the theory to be inconsistent. However if a pairs of Higgsinos are added, there is no gauge anomaly. The simplest theory is one with a single pair of Higgsinos and therefore a pair of scalar Higgs doublets.
    In addition to this previous argument, a pair of Higgs doublets (called the up-type Higgs and the down-type Higgs) is desired in order to have renormalizable
    Yukawa couplings between the Higgs and all the Standard Model fermions because the couplings have to be holomorphic.



    top

    MSSM Superfields
    The superfield formulation of supersymmetry is very convenient to write down manifestly supersymmetric theories (i.e. one does not have to tediously check that the theory is supersymmetric term by term in the Lagrangian).
    The MSSM contains vector superfields associated with the Standard Model gauge groups which contain the vector bosons and associated gauginos. It also contains chiral superfields for the Standard Model fermions and Higgs bosons (and their respective superpartners).










    fieldmultiplicityrepresentationZ2-parity
    Q3(3,2)_
    Uc3(ar,1)_
    Dc3(ar,1)_
    L3(1,2)_
    Ec3(1,1)_1
    Hu1(1,2)_+
    Hd1(1,2)_+


    top

    The MSSM Lagrangian
    The Lagrangian for the MSSM contains several pieces.

      The first is the Kahler potential for the matter and Higgs fields which produces the kinetic terms for the fields.

      The second piece is the gauge field superpotential that produces the kinetic terms for the gauge bosons and gauginos.


    W = mu H_u H_d+ y_u H_u Q U^c+ y_d H_d Q D^c + y_l H_d L E^c

    The constant term is unphysical in global supersymmetry.

    top

    Soft Susy Breaking
    The last piece of the MSSM Lagrangian is the soft supersymmetry breaking Lagrangian. The vast majority of the parameters of the MSSM are in the susy breaking Lagrangian. The soft susy breaking are divided into roughly three pieces.

      The first are the gaugino masses

    mathcal supset m_ ilde ilde + h.c.

    Where ilde are the gauginos and m_ is different for the wino, bino and gluino.

      The next are the soft masses for the scalar fields

    mathcal supset m_0 phi^dagger phi

    where phi are any of the scalars in the MSSM and m_0 are 3 imes 3 hermitean matrices for the squarks and sleptons of a given gauge quantum numbers.

      Finally there are the A and B terms which are given by

    mathcal supset B_ h_u h_d + A h_u ilde ilde+ A h_d ilde ilde +A h_d ilde ilde + h.c.

    The A terms are 3 imes 3 complex matrices much as the scalar masses are.

    top

    The CMSSM
    There is a particular ansatz for the soft supersymmetry breaking that is very popular in the literature known as the 'Constrained MSSM' (fomerly called mSugra). In this ansatz, all of the squark and slepton soft masses are assumed to be the same
    at the GUT scale and to not violate flavor. Similarly all of the A-terms are also taken to be flavor independent and universal at the GUT scale as well. Finally all of the gaugino masses are taken to the same at the GUT scale. With this ansatz, the parameters are RGE evolved to the TeV scale and masses and interactions of the particles are studied. The useful aspect of this parameterization of supersymmetry breaking is that it results in phenomologically acceptable parameters and only has 4 continuous parameters to vary and one sign. The down side is that no known theory of supersymmetry breaking is known to give this exact pattern of supersymmetry breaking.

    top

    Electroweak Symmetry Breaking
    Electroweak symmetry is broken using the Higgs mechanism where a Higgs doublet acquires a
    vacuum expectation value (vev). The MSSM contains two Higgs doublet, h_u and h_d
    where the subscripts indicate whether the Higgs couples to up-type fermions or down-type fermions (down quarks and
    charged leptons):

    mathcal supset y_u, h_u q u^c + y_d, h_d q d^c+ y_e, h_d l e^c + h.c.

    In order to have all the Standard Model fermions acquire mass, both Higgs doublets must acquire a vev

    langle h_u
    angle = v_u/sqrt
    ; langle h_d

    angle= v_d/sqrt

    (we can use the freedom to rescale the Higgs superfields by a complex phase to ensure that the VEVs are positive real) Usually these are rewritten in terms of the effective electroweak vev and the ratio of the two vev

    v^2 = v_u^2 + v_d^2

    an eta = rac.


    top

    The Higgs Mass
    The mass of the lightest Higgs boson is set by the Higgs quartic coupling. Quartic couplings are not soft supersymmetry breaking parameters since they lead to a quadratic divergences to the Higgs mass. Furthermore, there are no supersymmetric parameters to make the Higgs mass a free parameter in the MSSM (though not in non-minimal extensions). This means that Higgs mass is a prediction of the MSSM. The Higgs boson was not found at LEP II and the four experiments placed a lower limit on the Higgs mass of 114.4 GeV. This lower limit is significantly above where the MSSM would typically predict it to be, and while it does not rule out the MSSM, the non-discovery of the Higgs makes proponents of the MSSM nervous.
    If the Higgs is found above 125 GeV (along with the other superparticles) at the LHC, then this will strongly hint at new dynamics beyond the MSSM such as the 'Next to Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model' (NMSSM).

    top

    Neutralinos and Charginos
    After electroweak symmetry breaking, the Higgsinos, Binos and Winos will mix with each other. The mass eigenstates are called Neutralinos and Charginos depending on whether the particles are electrically neutral or charged. Typically the lightest neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle and makes up the dark matter of the universe.

    top

    Problems with the MSSM
    There are several problems with the MSSM — most of them falling into the understanding the parameters.
      Flavor universality of soft masses and A-terms
      Smallness of CP violating phases

    More recently physicists have become concerned about the non-discovery of the Higgs boson, or any superpartner at LEP II or the Tevatron.

    top

    Theories of Supersymmetry Breaking
    A large amount of theoretical effort has been spent trying to understand the mechanism for soft supersymmetry breaking
    that produces the desired properties in the superpartner masses and interactions. The three most extensively studied
    mechanisms are
     
    Search more:
     

       
    Source Privacy License Download Contact Us Atlas
    Scientus.org Dictionary (Yet Another Wiki) RC : 1.39
    MIT OpenCourseWare
    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License [copyleft]. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model". link