Navigation
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Most Active
  • Popular
  • Blog
  • Credits
  • RSS
  •   Interaction
  • Register
  • Statistics
  •   Help
  • Suggestions
  • Contact Us
  • How to Edit
  • Help



  • [Edit]


    In philosophy, the term logical fallacy properly refers to a formal fallacy
    a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument which renders the argument invalid. However, it is often used more generally in informal discourse to mean an argument which is problematic for any reason, and thus encompasses informal fallacies – valid but unsound claims or bad nondeductive argumentation – as well as formal fallacies.

    __TOC__
    The presence of a formal fallacy in a deductive argument does not imply anything about the argument's premises or its conclusion. Both may actually be true, or even more probable as a result of the argument (e.g. appeal to authority), but the deductive argument is still invalid because the conclusion does not follow from the premises in the manner described. By extension, an argument can contain a formal fallacy even if the argument is not a deductive one; for instance an inductive argument that incorrectly applies principles of probability or causality can be said to commit a formal fallacy.

    Recognizing fallacies in everyday arguments may be difficult since arguments are often embedded in rhetorical patterns that obscure the logical connections between statements. Informal fallacies may also exploit the emotions or intellectual or psychological weaknesses of the audience. Having the capability to recognize fallacies in arguments is one way to reduce the likelihood of such occurrences.

    A different approach to understanding and classifying fallacies is provided by argumentation theory; see for instance the van Eemeren, Grootendorst reference below. In this approach, an argument is regarded as an interactive protocol between individuals which attempts to resolve a disagreement. The protocol is regulated by certain rules of interaction and violations of these rules are fallacies. Many of the fallacies in the list below are best understood as being fallacies in this sense.


        Logical fallacy
            Common examples
            See also

    top

    Common examples

      Formal fallacies
      Informal Relevance fallacies
      Informal Verbal fallacies

    For a list of types of formal and informal fallacy, as well as examples of fallacious arguments, see Fallacy. For a concise list of "appeal to" fallacies, see Appeal (disambiguation).

    top

    See also
     
    Search more:
     

       
    Source Privacy License Download Contact Us Atlas
    Scientus.org Dictionary (Yet Another Wiki) RC : 1.39
    MIT OpenCourseWare
    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License [copyleft]. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Logical fallacy". link