|
Empty nose syndrome (ENS), is a condition that is caused when too much inner nasal mucus-producing tissues (the turbinates) are cut out of the nose, leaving the nasal cavities too empty and wide, with severely diminshed capabilities to perform their functions of conducting and preparing the inhaled air to the lungs. These operations, known as turbinate resections, turbinectomies, or nasal conchotomies, are performed by ear nose and throat surgeons or by plastic surgeons for different reasons. The most common reason is when those turbinates get chronically swollen and block too much of the nasal airways. Among the most common causes for turbinates to swell and over-grow (“turbinate hypertrophy”) are: Allergies, hormonal imbalance, too much exposure to dust, smoke and other airborne irritants, nasal structural deformities like a deviated septum and prolonged use of nasal decongesting medications. The nose is a very important organ. Besides what it’s most famous for, being the major characteristic feature of the human face, and the smelling organ, the nose is also the most important breathing conductor to the lungs. It acts as the guardian of the lungs by heating, humidifying and filtering the inspired air before it enters the lungs. The nose is also in charge of sensing and smelling the inspired airflow and enriches our lives with a whole range of sensations which are crucial for maintaining healthy patterns of emotional, cognitive and sexual brain functions and behaviors. A crippled nose can have a huge impact on a person's quality of life, and it can cause depression, slow down and impair cognitive processes and inhibit sexual and social activities. It can also cause a person to feel weak and depleted of energy. The term "empty nose syndrome" was originally coined in the 1990's by Dr. E.B. Kern who was at the time head of the ENT ward in the Mayo Clinic (Rochester Minn., USA). He and his colleagues began to notice that more and more patients that underwent turbinetomies seem to have developed symptoms of nasal obstruction even though their noses appeared to be wide open. Other symptoms were nasal dryness, shallow unrested sleep, difficulty concentrating, and quite often clinical depression too. All those patients' CT scans showed they had very wide and almost totally empty nasal cavities, thus they called it the "Empty Nose Syndrome". Dr. Kern then went on to give a series of lectures on ENS, and later summerized his findings in a fomous medical artical: Atrophic rhinitis: A review of 242 cases. by Moore EJ, and Kern EB. In American Journal of Rhinology. November- December 2001, volume 15, number 6. What happens when ENS occurs When too much of the turbinates are resected, the nose loses its capacities to properly pressurize, direct, temperature regulate, humidify, filter, smell and sense the inspired airflow. The natural synchronization of breathing between the nose, the mouth and the lungs is also interfered, and the result is an empty, dry and crippled nose, which feels too empty and at the same time obstructed. The Empty Nose Syndrome patient feels a constant shortness of breath, his sleep becomes very shallow and many develop sleep apnea too. ENS sufferers tend to be depressed and anxious, which may cause them to avoid social interactions. Sinus pressure, nasal or facial pain, is sometimes an issue too. The main problem in ENS - paradoxical obstruction: ENS is characterized initially by grossly enlarged airways, that go at once from being too obstructed to being too open. This has a dramatic impact on the inhaled air through the nose, which results in significant breathing difficulty known as "pardoxical obstruction". This obstruction is caused by three pathalogical factors that occur when the turbinates are removed: a) The airflow becomes too turbulent, hence less air gets conducted efficiently through the nose to the lungs. b) The airflow motion receptors, embedded in the nasal mucosal layers, do not get stimulated enough, and this registers in the brain's breathing centers as a breathing obstruction. c) The dramatic loss of humidifying, filtering, and air heating tissues of the turbinates reduce the quality of the air that does reach the lungs, and this results in less efficient gas exchange at the alveoli of the lungs. ENS is not Atrophic Rhinitis, but can cause it: The main danger with prolonged Empty Nose Syndrome is developing Atrophic Rhinitis, which is an inflammatory, degenerating disease of the nasal cavities and sinuses, characterized by degeneration of nasal bone and soft tissue, enlarged nasal cavities and totally dysfunctional remaining nasal mucosa, which is often accompanied by foul smelling secretions (known as “Ozaena”), nosebleeds and crusts. For many years, people with ENS have been automatically labeled as suffering from Secondary Atrophic Rhinitis. "Secondary" - to imply that the chronic state of nasal atrophy was caused by surgery, as opposed to "Primary" in which the atrophy occurs from other reasons that are not induced by medical intervention. ENS is an iatrogenic condition too ("iatrogenic" = caused by medical procedure or therapy), but it is not Atrophic Rhinitis, although very similar and can definitely develop into it. The main characteristics in ENS are the paradoxical breathing difficulties. to the naked eye - the remaining mucosal tissues usually seem healthy and normal (besides the fact that a large portion of the nasal mucosa's has been lost in the turbinectomy). Over the years, this remaining mucosa can become drier and drier, and there is a danger that it will go through metaplasia and become atrophic, but only then can it be diagnosed as Atrophic Rhinitis. Symptoms ENS can cause a wide variety of symptoms, some directly relating to the nose and others relating to other parts of the body. All symptoms listed can significantly affect a person's quality of life. Physical symptoms may include: Certain sleep problems are also symptoms: Psychological symptoms: Cognitive symptoms: Treatments Once too much of a turbinate is resected it cannot recover, grow back, or be replaced. There are no donor sites in the human body with a similar kind of tissue. The turbinates and nasal mucosa are unique. ENS, can be improved to varying degrees of success, by trying to fabricate the structure and quality of the missing turbinate, with biomaterials such as Alloderm and/or SIS. Non-surgical treatment There are different types of treatment available for ENS. Saline (physiological salt water, 0.9% sodium-chloride) can be used to rinse out the dry mucus and moisten the nasal cavity, this could also prevent infection. Some people find relief by increasing nasal secretions by consuming large amounts of dairy products. Vitamin A and D might help with mucus production. Humidifiers can be used to help with the dryness, and in cases of sleep disordered breathing a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine with a built-in humidifier can be used. Acupuncture, shiatsu, inversion therapy, regular physical exercise - all these will improve the blood circulation to the nose and help preserve the remaining nasal mucosa. All the above non-surgical treatments will help improve dryness conditions, and sustain the health of the remaining membranes, but they will not restore the lost functions or the nose and normal nasal sensations. Surgical treatment If a significant portion of a turbinate remains, it can be augmented with acellular dermis ("Alloderm") or SIS, two known natural biomaterials, with low absorption and rejection rates. Once either of these materials are implanted in the desired area, the implants incorporate into the surrounding tissue and adopt much of the host-tissue's qualities. The implants help to normalize the nasal pressures and aerodynamics of airflow, restore normal nasal sensations and improve nasal humidity. Other materials can be used as implants, but none showed the same level of success as Alloderm. Today there is also a new approved form of micronized Alloderm, brand named - Cymetra, that can be injected in a liquid form. Once it is in place it solidifies and becomes like regular Allodrem. It is difficult or virtually impossible to use cymetra on its own to achieve a large volume implant, but it can be used successfully to further augment prior Alloderm made implants, thus perfecting the initial result achieved with regular Alloderm. Alloderm implants have been implanted successfully already, for a few years now, in a small but growing number of ENS patients. At two years follow up, results seem stable and encouraging, and research papers reporting case studies are in-line to be published. SIS has been used successfully for other inner nasal defects, such as for septal perforations, but hasn't been used yet for treating ENS. In theory it should be just as good and perhaps even better than Alloderm. But, it comes in much thinner and more delicate sheets of material, than Alloderm does, therefore larger quantities of material are needed and it becomes very hard to use when a large and bulging implant needs to be form. For this reason only, Alloderm has so far been preferred. The probability of success, for implant surgery for ENS, lies in how much of the original turbinate(s) remains, the condition of the remaining inner nasal tissues, the overall state of health of the patient, and of-course the expertise of the surgeon who must also be highly qualified in understanding the complexities of nasal physiology and especially it's aerodynamics. In cases where too much turbinate tissue has been removed, and the surgeon estimates that the turbinate can't be augmented successfully, there are still things that can be attempted surgically, which might improve the symptoms. For example - augmenting the septum opposite of the resected turbinate, and other tricks that an ENS educated surgeon should know. There aren't any official statistics of long-term implant case studies published yet. A known American ENT surgeon, who has gained quite a lot of experience with turbinate augmentations, is Dr. Steven Houser from Cleveland (see links for Dr. Houser's web-site and ENS tutorial). He has a keen scientific interest in researching, understanding and treating ENS. Hopefully, as doctors are becoming more aware of ENS, they will reach a better understanding of the long-term effects which ENS has on the quality of life of ENS patients. This will hopefully encourage more and more surgeons to develop better and better ways for reconstructing resected nasal turbinates. Quotations This is what a panel of top American rhinology experts from the American Rhinological Society had to say about Empty Nose Syndrome: "… The excess removal of turbinate tissue might lead to empty-nose syndrome. Excess resection can lead to crusting, bleeding, breathing difficulty (often the paradoxical sensation of obstruction), recurrent infections, nasal odor, pain, and often clinical depression. In one study, the mean onset of symptoms occurred more than 8 years following the turbinectomies.” (cited from: “The turbinates in nasal and sinus surgery: A consensus statement.” By D. H. Rice, E. B. Kern, B. F. Marple, R. L. Mabry, W. H. Friedman. ENT – Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, February 2003, pp. 82-83.) This is what Dr. E.B. Kern (former president of the American and of the International Rhinological Societies) has to say about radical turbinectomies: “Removal of an entire inferior turbinate for benign disease is strongly discouraged because removal of an inferior turbinate can produce nasal atrophy and a miserable person. Such people unfortunately are still seen in the author’s offices; these people are nasal cripples.” (from page 496 of chapter 23, “Nasal Obstruction”, written by Dr. E Kern, Of the book: Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, by Dr. Meyyerhoff and Dr. Rice, published by the W.B. Saunders Company, 1992). When reexamining groups of patients who had undergone total inferior turbinectomies, and were expected by their surgeons to be well in the long run, Moore et al’ found that that was not to be the case at all, as the grim reality of those post inferior turbinectomied patients revealed itself: “Total inferior turbinectomy has been proposed as a treatment for chronic nasal airway obstruction refractory to other, more conservative, methods of treatment. Traditionally, it has been criticized because of its adverse effects on nasophysiology. In this study, patients who had previously undergone total inferior turbinectomy were evaluated with the use of an extensive questionnaire. It confirms that total inferior turbinectomy carries significant morbidity and should be condemned.” (from – “Extended Follow-Up Of Total Inferior Turbinate Resection For Relief Of Chronic Nasal Obstruction”, G. F. Moore, T. J. Freeman, F. P. Ogren & A. J. Yonkers., Laryngoscope, September 1985, pp. 1095-1099.) | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
 |
|
| |