Navigation
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Most Active
  • Popular
  • Blog
  • Credits
  • RSS
  •   Interaction
  • Register
  • Statistics
  •   Help
  • Suggestions
  • Contact Us
  • How to Edit
  • Help



  • [Edit]





    The International Astronomical Union (IAU), the official scientific body for astronomical nomenclature, defines a "dwarf planet" as a celestial body that, within the Solar System,

    (a) is in orbit around the Sun;

    (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape;

    (c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit; and

    (d) is not a satellite

    At present, the term only applies to objects in the Solar System. It is considered to be separate and distinct from "planets" and "small solar system bodies".

    The IAU's position on dwarf planets within our solar system was formally adopted at the 2006 IAU general assembly. It differs from the definition of "planet" in that a dwarf planet has not cleared its orbital neighbourhood. Before the adoption of the 2006 resolution, there was no formally specified scientific definition of "dwarf planet".

    Under the IAU's definition, our solar system is currently considered to have three dwarf planets: Ceres, Pluto and Eris. However, many more objects could be added to the list once it has been determined whether they fulfil criterion (b).


        Dwarf planet
                List of dwarf planets
            Size and mass of dwarf planets
            Orbital dominance
            Contention
            Types of dwarf planets
            See also

    top

    List of dwarf planets
    The IAU has officially identified three celestial bodies that have immediately received "dwarf planet" classification:(in sidereal days)
    | 0.3781 || -6.38718
    (retrograde) ||
    |- align = "left"
    ! Orbital radius | 2.5-2.9
    2.766
    413,715,000 || 29.66-49.30
    39.48168677
    5,906,376,200 || 37.77-97.56
    67.6681
    10,210,000,000
    |- align = "left"
    ! Orbital period | 4.599 || 248.09 || 557
    |- align = "left"
    ! Mean orbital speed
    (in km/s)
    | 17.882 || 4.7490 || 3.436
    |- align = "left"
    ! Orbital Eccentricity
    | 0.080 || 0.24880766 || 0.44177
    |- align = "left"
    ! Orbital inclination
    |10.587° || 17.14175° || 44.187°
    |- align = "left"
    ! Inclination of the equator from the orbit
    (see Axial tilt)
    | 4° || 119.61° ||
    |- align = "left"
    ! Mean surface temperature (in K)
    | 167 || 40 || 30
    |- align = "left"
    ! Number of natural satellites
    | 0 || 3 || 1
    |- align = "left"
    ! Date of Discovery
    | January 1, 1801 || February 18, 1930 || January 5, 2005
    |}

      Measured relative to the Earth.

    Additionally, there are several bodies potentially qualifying as "dwarf planets". Among these the following are known or thought to be greater than around 750 km in diameter:



    The status of Charon, currently regarded as a satellite of Pluto, remains uncertain as there is presently no clear definition of what distinguishes a satellite system from a binary (double planet) system. The original draft resolution (5) presented to the IAU stated that Charon could be considered a planet because:
      Charon independently would satisfy the size and shape criteria for planetary status (and in the terms of the final resolution, for the status of dwarf planet)
      Charon, on account of its large mass relative to Pluto, revolves with Pluto around a common barycentre located in space between Pluto and Charon rather than around a point located within Pluto.
    This definition, however, was not preserved in the IAU's final resolution. It is unknown if it will be taken up at a future date. If a similar definition were to be adopted, Charon would be added to the list of dwarf planets.

    The second, third, and fourth largest asteroids (Vesta, Pallas and Hygiea) could be classified as dwarf planets if it is shown that their shape is determined by hydrostatic equilibrium. At present this has not been demonstrated conclusively.

    top

    Size and mass of dwarf planets
    The upper and lower limits to the size and mass of dwarf planets are not specified in IAU resolution 5A. There is strictly no upper limit, and an object larger or more massive than Mercury that is considered not to have "cleared the neighborhood around its orbit" may still be classified as a dwarf planet.

    The lower limit is determined by the concept of hydrostatic equilibrium shape, but the size or mass at which an object attains this shape is undefined, and empirical observations suggest that it may vary according to the composition and history of the object. The original draft of IAU resolution 5 defined hydrostatic equilibrium shape as applying "to objects with mass above 5 kg and diameter greater than 800 km", but this language was not retained in the final resolution 5A that was passed.

    According to some astronomers, the new definition could mean the addition of up to 45 new dwarf planets.

    top

    Orbital dominance


    Astronomers S. Alan Stern, Harold F. Levison, Steven Soter, and others have argued for a distinction between dwarf planets and the other eight planets based on their inability to "clear the neighborhood around their orbits", that is, to remove smaller bodies whose orbits bring them nearby by collision, capture, or gravitational disturbance. This concept is combined with a concept of orbital dominance measured in terms of the ratio of the mass of a planetary candidate to the combined mass of all other objects in its vicinity. Dwarf planets are too small in mass to significantly alter their environment in the manner of a planet.

    There are several other theories that try to differentiate between planets and dwarf planets, but the current definition of what constitutes a planet uses this concept.

    Stern et al introduce a paramater Λ, expressing the probability of an encounter resulting in a given deflection of orbit. The value of this parameter in Stern’s model is proportional to the square of the mass and inversely proportional to the period. Following the authors, this value can be used to estimate the capacity of a body to clear the neighbourhood of its orbit. Stern and Levison found a gap of five orders of magnitude in Λ between the smallest terrestrial planets and the largest asteroids and KBOs:


      ME in Earth masses.
        Λ/ΛE = M2/P, in Earth masses squared per year.
          µ = M/m, where M is the mass of the body, and m is the aggregate mass of all the other bodies that share its orbital zone.



    top

    Contention

    A number of scientists expressed their disagreement with the currently adopted IAU definition of "dwarf planet" by means of car bumper stickers and about 300 scientists signed a petition against the related redefinition of "planet", stating that they will not use it.

    While accepting the characterization of "dwarf planet" for and (dwarf-planet in this case meaning just a "small planet"), Stern rejects the current IAU definition of planet, both in terms of defining "dwarf planets" as something other than a type of planet, and in using orbital characteristics (rather than intrinsic characteristics) of objects to define them as dwarf planets. Thus, he and his team will still refer to Pluto as the ninth planet. One should also note, that it will be in pages hosted by NASA and controlled by Stern's team, that the upcoming information and the first photographs of Pluto will be unveiled to the world. However, NASA has announced that it will use the new guidelines established by the IAU.

    top

    Types of dwarf planets

    The IAU's Resolution 6a

    top

    See also
     
    Search more:
     

       
    Source Privacy License Download Contact Us Atlas
    Scientus.org Dictionary (Yet Another Wiki) RC : 1.39
    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License [copyleft]. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Dwarf planet". link