|
Debate There has been some debate in the past on precisely where to draw the line between a double planet and a planet-moon system. In most cases, it is not an issue because the moon is of very small mass relative to its host planet. In particular, the Earth-Moon and Pluto-Charon systems are the only examples in our present Solar System where the mass of a moon is larger than one fortieth of one percent of the mass of the host planet or dwarf planet(i.e. mass ratio of 0.00025 or less). On the other hand, the Earth and the Moon have a mass ratio of 0.01230, and Pluto and its moon Charon have a mass ratio of 0.147. A commonly accepted cutoff point is when the center of mass that the two objects orbit around (the barycenter) is not located under the surface of either body, in which case the barycenter is in space between the two bodies. This literally makes the difference between whether one body orbits around the other body, or whether both bodies orbit about a point in space between them. By this definition, Pluto and Charon could be seen as a "double" (dwarf) planet and Earth and Moon would not. In 2006 the International Astronomical Union briefly considered a formal definition of the term double planet which could have formally included Pluto and Charon, but this definition was not ratified. Two planets colliding with each other The second usage for the term double planet, in the context of the theory of the origin of the Moon (i.e. Earth's Moon), is a set of two planets of comparable mass that collide with each other - i.e. with at least transiently overlapping orbits. A double planet in this sense occurred in the very early solar system, consisting of the proto-Earth and a second, Mars-sized planet that collided with it at an oblique angle, in the consensus hypothesis of the formation of the Earth-Moon system. The second body was not a proto-Moon because most of its mass was incorporated into the Earth, while the Moon formed from a small fraction of debris kicked up from the Earth by the collision. These double planet precursor bodies to the Earth-Moon system had roughly comparable mass - i.e. a mass ratio in the neighborhood of 10:1. This happens to be similar to the mass ratio of Pluto-Charon. Two planets orbiting a star A third usage has arisen since 1995 when we began to discover extrasolar planets in other Solar Systems. In this context, the term double planet system is used to refer to another Solar System in which two planets have been discovered orbiting the star. As of 2003, there were ten known star systems outside our own with at least two detected planets, qualifying at least as double planet systems. Multiple planet systems with more than two planets have been discovered as well, including the Upsilon Andromedae, Rho-1 Cancri (or 55 Cancri), and Mu Arae systems. Asimovs proposed definition The late Isaac Asimov suggested a distinction between planet-moon systems and double-planet systems based on what he called a tug-of-war value that describes whether the presumed satellite is more firmly under the gravitational influence of the presumed planetary primary or the Sun. In the case of the Moon, the Sun "wins" the tug of war, i.e., its gravitational hold on the Moon is greater than that of Earth. The opposite is true for other presumed satellites in the Solar System (with a few exceptions), including the Pluto-Charon system. By this definition, the Earth and Moon form a double-planet system, but Pluto and Charon represent a true primary with a satellite. This definition has not received wide attention in the professional literature. A major criticism of this is that two pairs of bodies of identical size but at different distances from their star could mean one pair would be classed as a double planet and the other pair not. Another criticism is that the definition does not account for the proportional difference in size between the two bodies, so that a circumstance may arise where either: a, two similarly sized objects would be considered a planet-moon system, if close enough to each other, or b. a grossly disproportionate pair could be considered a double-planet, if given sufficient distance between them. This definition was only intended to discuss the unique nature of the earth moon system. Asimov only concluded that the moon had the sun as it's primary; that the earth had lost the tug of war and that the moon was not a satellite of the earth. It was not proposed as a final double planet definition but as only one test that would distinguish between a double planet and a satellite/primary system. This part of the required final definition uses a mathematical test. The relative size requirement was not discussed. Relative size involves an arbitrary limit rather than a clean mathematical one. Sources | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
 |
|
| |