|
Criticisms The Center for Consumer Freedom, a non-profit U.S. lobby group funded by the fast food, meat, and tobacco industries, criticize CSPI through one of its websites. CCF regards CSPI as part of the "food police". It claims that "(CSPI) and its founder, Michael F. Jacobson, are not as nice, sweet, and unbiased as CSPI's name might imply. CSPI routinely uses scare tactics justified by "junk science" and media theatrics as part of their ceaseless campaign for government regulation of your personal food choices." As a result, several critics of CSPI often refer to the organization as being in favor of a nanny state. The Heartland Institute, a free-market oriented public policy think tank, says that "What makes officious nannies like CSPI so maddening is that they cloak their apparent goal of prohibition in the language of health advocacy. Some of the advice in the group's Nutrition Action Healthletter is perfectly sensible, but the remainder can be highly controversial." Undue Influence, a website funded by Ron Arnold, vice-president of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, claims that "For 30 years CSPI has injected ideology, politics and fear-mongering into science to attack nearly every food product, every restaurant, and every cuisine on the market. Seeks power over the diet of all Americans through a "fat-tax" on hamburgers, french fries and soft drinks." Bob Barr a former U.S. Congressman, while admitting he is "completely unqualified to issue scientific opinions", says that CSPI does not conduct research but carries out smear campaigns against scientists who publish research which contradicts their ideas. * | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
![]() |
|
| |